🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.